Innovation and entrepreneurship are everywhere these days. Schools are talking about nurturing young entrepreneurs, colleges are searching for ways to spark fresh ideas, and companies are racing to find their AI edge.
But much of what we call “innovation” is still happening at the surface. Learners are quick to replicate, copy, or automate. A study by MIT’s Media Lab found that participants using ChatGPT leaned increasingly on copy-paste behavior rather than meaningful composition—suggesting a decline in deep engagement and creativity.
True innovation requires something else. It needs people who can think critically, imagine boldly, and design solutions that matter. Education leaders are noticing this too. OpenAI’s Head of Education, Leah Belsky, aptly put it, “AI is ultimately a tool. What matters most in an education space is how that tool is used. If students use AI as an answer machine, they are not going to learn. And so, part of our journey here is to help students and educators use AI in ways that will expand critical thinking and expand creativity.” This suggests that if education merely uses AI as a shortcut, we risk a generation of shallow thinkers. People who see AI as a collaborator, not just a shortcut.
That’s the leap we need to make.
Why Skills Alone Don’t Create Innovators
For years, education and training have focused on skill-building: learn the syntax, master the tool, follow the formula. Useful, yes — but by themselves, skills don’t produce innovators.
AI without deeper thinking risks becoming just another productivity hack. Problem-based thinking without the leverage of AI risks staying somewhat reductive. But together, they open a pathway for learners of any age to approach complex challenges, imagine possibilities, and design solutions that are both original and responsible.
Globally, the trend is clear:
- A hands-on study from Finland involving 4th–7th graders showed that co-designing AI apps—rather than merely coding—significantly boosts children’s AI understanding, critical thinking, and ethical awareness
- Singapore’s 2024 ‘future design school’ blueprint commits to integrating design thinking as a central life skill from primary through tertiary levels
- UNESCO and IB emphasize empathy, inclusive design, and critical judgment as core to AI literacy.
Different contexts, same message: the future belongs to thinkers, not just tool users.
This isn’t just a global perspective though. It aligns strongly with CBSE and NEP mandates on experiential, hands-on learning and AI and Design Thinking as necessary inclusions in curriculum. The question is: how do we make it real in day-to-day learning experiences?
Engagerooms: Where Innovation Gets Lived
That’s where Engagerooms come in – spaces where learners step straight into complex challenges, before they can fall back on rote knowledge or pre-learned answers.
Imagine this challenge: “Design an AI-powered city from the perspective of street vendors.”
- Day 1: Learners propose vending machines or robots replacing vendors. Clever, but shallow.
- Days 2–4: Through guided labs, they test assumptions, uncover biases, and explore user perspectives. They realize replacement ignores the resilience of informal economies. They learn that what vendors really need is fair space, smoother payments, wider reach.
- Day 5: Their solutions transform: AI tools that help vendors find better locations, connect with customers, and manage transactions seamlessly — solutions that augment human work rather than erase it.
That shift doesn’t happen by accident. Engagerooms flip the usual model of learning. Instead of climbing Bloom’s Taxonomy from the bottom up, learners begin at the top — creating, evaluating, analyzing. They wrestle with complexity first. Later, when they learn technical details and subject-specific knowledge, they absorb it more deeply because they’ve already seen its relevance in action.
Beyond Skillset: Building Whole Innovators
Engagerooms are cross-cutting — whether you’re in middle school, college, or the workplace — they don’t just build skills. They also cultivate:
- Mindset: Seeing AI as an enabler, not a threat. Building resilience by iterating and embracing failure.
- Heartset: Designing with empathy and inclusivity. Valuing collaboration and multiple perspectives.
- Soulset: Grounding innovation in ethics and purpose. Asking not “How do we solve this fastest?” but “What’s the most sustainable and responsible solution?”
When skillset, mindset, heartset, and soulset come together, learners stop being passive consumers of technology. They become active, reflective problem-solvers — innovators in the truest sense.
Tackling Real Barriers
But what about teachers/trainers, what about curriculum?
- Teacher confidence: Educators don’t need to be AI experts. In Engagerooms, they facilitate alongside learners, guiding thinking instead of mastering every tool. Technical depth is supported by experts and industry professionals, so teachers can focus on guiding thinking.
- Curriculum quality: These experiences are co-created with AI and design thinking specialists, learning designers, and industry practitioners. That makes them rigorous, practical, and globally benchmarked — while staying locally relevant.
Once students have wrestled with problem-solving, they are more primed to acquire relevant syntax, coding, and other subject-specific skills.
The Future of Innovation
We have already seen over a number of years that business and technology tools and buzzwords will come and go. What lasts is the capacity to think deeply, design responsibly, and innovate with purpose.
Engagerooms are one way to build these capacities and to prepare learners not just for the next tool or trend, but for futures they can confidently imagine and build. Isn’t that what real innovation should be about?
Leave a Reply